Menu
Lord over Life
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Statement of Faith
    • Contact Us
  • Theology
    • Reformed and Reforming
    • Apologetics
    • The Christian Life
  • Government
    • Law
    • Economics
    • Social Justice
  • Society
    • Marriage and Family
    • Work and Labor
    • Education
    • The Church
  • Culture
    • Philosophy
    • Art
    • Entertainment
  • Services & Resources
    • Teaching Services
    • Book Recommendations
    • Web Recommendations
  • Support
    • The Bahnsen Project
    • Prayer Requests
  • Blog
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Statement of Faith
    • Contact Us
  • Theology
    • Reformed and Reforming
    • Apologetics
    • The Christian Life
  • Government
    • Law
    • Economics
    • Social Justice
  • Society
    • Marriage and Family
    • Work and Labor
    • Education
    • The Church
  • Culture
    • Philosophy
    • Art
    • Entertainment
  • Services & Resources
    • Teaching Services
    • Book Recommendations
    • Web Recommendations
  • Support
    • The Bahnsen Project
    • Prayer Requests
  • Blog

Book Review: Politics According to the Bible

10/18/2012

Comments

 
Politics According to the Bible
GOP Republicanism baptized with Christian proof-texts

While I appreciate that Grudem presents the reader with a lot of thoughtful research and analysis in well presented style, tone, and sincerity, I have a very difficult time in seeing how this book lives up to its title.

The book is definitely about politics from a Christian perspective - Grudem's Christian perspective. But it is certainly not a standard on politics "according to the Bible."

As far as I’m concerned it really seems like the book presents the Republican platform baptized in proof-text Christian Scriptures.

The great things about this book are the very detailed explanations of how our government is supposed to work (concerning how it was originally set up), how it's currently functioning, and some of the difficult issues that are dividing the nation. There really is a great deal of reference material in here and some truly sobering facts.

The down side to the book was how a Christian is actually supposed to respond. He argues that Christians should have significant influence in their government, and he presents some texts that indicate as much. And that is great! But he approaches the Scriptures with a very pick-and-choose attitude as to which texts actually apply to politics.
Particularly disturbing was his dealings with the very school of thought that can actually do much more than simply criticize the current government situation but that can truly offer a substantial alternative with solid authority behind it - the school of thought known as Theonomy.

Grudem was very un-scholarly approach in dismissing theonomic principles when it comes to politics.. His arguments were basically:
  1. Theonomy doesn't recognize a separation of church state (p. 66) a straw man argument if there ever was one - anyone who has actually read up on theonomy knows that there is a very clear separation of church and state (see Greg Bahnen's Theonomy in Christian Ethics, pp. 389-420).
  2. Some of the Old Testament laws are "severe" (with a negative connotation) and "should not be used as a pattern for governments today" (p. 84). I find this very odd since even the New Testament says that the Old Testament laws are "just" laws (Heb. 2:2) as well as "holy, righteous, and good" (Rom. 7:14) and that the Old Testament does display them as a pattern for a godly government (regardless of age - Deut. 4:8). Why he warrants Old Testament laws to be a bad pattern is beyond me.
  3. And finally, the all-so-impressive argument "most or all recognized leaders in the evangelical movement in the United States have clearly distanced themselves from [the theonomic] position" (p. 23) - as if that's even an argument. Oh how I wish this kind of logic was around when Martin Luther was teaching the Bible to the masses - "We probably shouldn't pay attention to what he's saying since most or all recognized leaders in the Roman Catholic Church have clearly distanced themselves from his position on justification." In reality, theonomy simply says God's Word is authoritative. But once we take that authority away it becomes a slippery slope.


Either way, in the case of Grudem in this book, for someone who opposes theonomy so strongly he did sure like to use the Old Testament  when it was convenient to his case. But I feel that this only continues to show the world the inconsistency of the evangelical Christian faith in America. We want to evangelize but not make disciples (who wants to teach doctrine? we know they're going to heaven, they prayed the prayer). We want to use the Old Testament as a pattern for societal justice, but only if it's convenient to our own cause. 

Example: there shouldn't be an estate tax, and the government shouldn't have so many regulations on the free market; but we shouldn't have such "severe" penalties for crimes like kidnapping, rape, murder, adultery, homosexuality, and we should be allowed to go anywhere in the world to spread democracy whether other countries like it or not.

This is truly Republican principles supposedly backed by the authority of Scripture. The problem is, as Grudem points out, Scripture does not authorize an estate tax nor intrusion in the economic marketplace. But contrary to what Grudem supposes, neither does it authorize a nation the normative prerogative in policing the world. Yet it does authorize “severe” (although the Bible doesn’t call them severe but just (Deut. 4:8; Heb. 2:2) laws for crimes like kidnapping, rape, murder, adultery, homosexuality, etc.

Abandoning theonomic principles (that is, God’s Word should be the standard for ethical norms), Grudem’s main supposition behind his book seems to be whatever seems practical to him in light of what he particularly likes about Scripture or the way things work.

For instance, he likes the idea found in Scripture that education of children belongs to the parents and not to the state. So he presents a case for the option of homeschooling and private schooling (p. 247-248). Yet even then it’s just the “option” for those two - he seems okay with the government taking money from private citizens to support state-sponsored schools (p. 249-256).

But he also likes the idea of the government "enacting laws against the production, distribution, and sale of pornographic materials" (p. 242). While pornography is clearly wrong morally (Mt. 5:27-28), God's Word does not authorize the government to make laws restricting it's uncoerced adult production. That is not a Biblical view of government and its purpose - but since Grudem particularly likes the idea of laws restricting pornography, he upholds it as being “Politics According to the Bible.”

There were certainly some good parts in the book. I must admit that if I wish to be fair (which I do). The best part for me personally was his research on the issues (massive references throughout the book), and his clear explanation of the government's separation of powers (or the separation that is supposed to be there) and how to get those powers back in balance.

But when the foundation is sand, the structure will fall (Mt. 7:24-27). And so while I do think it’s a good reference work, I certainly can’t endorse it as a book that is truly “Politics According to the Bible.”(1)



(1) For a Biblical or theological statement or defense of the orthodoxy of the theonomic perspective, I recommend the following:

Theonomy in Christian Ethics, Greg L. Bahnsen
By This Standard: The Authority of God's Law for Today, Greg L. Bahnsen
No Other Standard: Theonomy and Its Critics, Greg L. Bahnsen
God and Government, Gary DeMar
Theonomy: An Informed Response, ed. Gary North
Institutes of Biblical Law, R. J. Rushdoony
God is Just: A Defense of the Old Testament Civil Laws, Steve Halbrook
Comments

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Apologetics
    Art
    Books
    Christian Ethics
    Culture
    Devotional
    Economics
    Education
    Entertainment
    Family
    Government
    History
    Homosexuality
    Law
    Marriage
    Movies
    Philosophy
    Politics
    Prayer Requests
    Reformed And Reforming
    Social Justice
    Society
    The Christian Life
    The Church
    Theology
    War

Follow LordoverLife
Lord over Life © 2022. All rights reserved.

 Home | About | Contact | Blog