Menu
Lord over Life
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Statement of Faith
    • Contact Us
  • Theology
    • Reformed and Reforming
    • Apologetics
    • The Christian Life
  • Government
    • Law
    • Economics
    • Social Justice
  • Society
    • Marriage and Family
    • Work and Labor
    • Education
    • The Church
  • Culture
    • Philosophy
    • Art
    • Entertainment
  • Services & Resources
    • Teaching Services
    • Book Recommendations
    • Web Recommendations
  • Support
    • The Bahnsen Project
    • Prayer Requests
  • Blog
  • About
    • Mission and Vision
    • Statement of Faith
    • Contact Us
  • Theology
    • Reformed and Reforming
    • Apologetics
    • The Christian Life
  • Government
    • Law
    • Economics
    • Social Justice
  • Society
    • Marriage and Family
    • Work and Labor
    • Education
    • The Church
  • Culture
    • Philosophy
    • Art
    • Entertainment
  • Services & Resources
    • Teaching Services
    • Book Recommendations
    • Web Recommendations
  • Support
    • The Bahnsen Project
    • Prayer Requests
  • Blog

Why I'm Voting "No" on Issue 3

11/2/2015

Comments

 
Picture
I wish we lived in an Ohio where marijuana was legal. As I've written before, the Scripture does not categorically condemn mind-altering substances.

If it did, certain painkillers like acetaminophen would also be condemned, since they don't really take pain out of the body but simply alter your mind in the experience of that pain - similar to how alcohol is sometimes used.
Furthermore, God's Word - the standard to which all governing measures (whether self-governing, family-governing, church-governing, or state-governing) should be subject - never gives the State the right or authority to dictate what one can and cannot ingest in their bodies (provided it's not breaking some other lawful matter, like the taking away of an innocent life - for instance, the State does have a right to prohibit any type of ingestion that would induce an abortion, and execute those who would use such ingestions - Ex. 21:12, 22-25).

Therefore, yes, I think marijuana should be legal for individuals to grow and use.

Read More
Comments

A Few Words on Kim Davis

9/7/2015

Comments

 
I don't have much to add to the thousands of other voices that have been sounded in this issue. My particular favorites at this point have been the following:

Some Sober and Needful Thoughts on the Defiance of Clerks in Kentucky
by Matt Trewhella

Kim Davis and the call to all Christian officials
by Joel McDurmon

In Which I Paint With Some Bright Yellows
by Douglas Wilson
Picture
All I wish to do is to call attention to the false dichotomy being imposed in the chant: "Do your job or resign." For one thing, Kim Davis, by neglecting to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples, is doing her job. The State of Kentucky Constitution reads thus:

Read More
Comments

Book Review: The Establishment and Limits of Civil Government: An Exposition of Romans 13:1-7

5/27/2014

Comments

 
This was a very interesting read that I would recommend for anyone looking for a very thorough treatment of Romans 13:1-7 and its subsequent applications.

Admittedly the book took me places where I was unprepared to go and in which I found myself a little uncomfortable.

I was expecting the book to talk about the importance of the text in relating the civil magistrate to a minister of God. And it certainly did that.

What I was not expecting the book to speak to is how far we can (or should) allow the civil magistrate to go - outside its limits set by God - before submission to it is no longer a praiseworthy act of obedience to our Lord.
Picture
Written in the mid nineteenth century, the style was noticeably different from modern expositors. It was engaging; but you really have to be paying attention the entire time (i.e. this book is not one of those you can read with a toddler running around being all cute and cuddly and handing you things - you'll need to be in your study, alone).

Read More
Comments

Book Review: The Continuing Relevance of Divine Law 

3/21/2014

Comments

 
Dispensational Hermeneutics in Disguise

Written from the perspective of New Covenant Theology, this work is trying to bridge the gap between Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism. Eschatological issues aside, I had a hard time seeing how New Covenant Theology differs that much from Dispensationalism.

Zaspel tries to make a case for there being a law of God upon which the Mosaic Law is founded, yet maintaining that the two cannot be identical. He further tries to establish that the church’s dependence on the law of Moses is erroneous, the three-fold division of the law (into moral, ceremonial, and judicial) is unnecessary, and yet the disregarding of the law (which he charges dispensationalism with) is also in error.

In my opinion, confusion abounds.
The Continuing Relevance of Divine Law
When commentating on Romans 2 he advocates his position that the works of the law written on the hearts of the gentiles are simply “principles of righteousness” yet “independent of Mosaic legislation.” He does not prove this at all but simply asserts it. The apostle Paul knew how to say “principles of righteousness;” yet under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit he chose to say “works of the law.” In context of the passage and the readership of Romans I don’t know what else Paul could mean other than the Mosaic law. But apparently Zaspel has some insight into this text of which so many others throughout the history of the church are completely unaware.

Read More
Comments

Book Review: Theonomy and the Westminster Confession

1/28/2014

Comments

 
Theonomy and the Westminster Confession
A Historic Defense of the Un-Heretical Heresy

This is not a Biblical defense of the theological orthodoxy of theonomy.(1) Instead, it is a historical defense that the theonomic viewpoint is not at all something new. This is a book of quotes from primary sources of men who either (a) were members of the Westminster Assembly, (b) gave theological influence to members of the Assembly, or (c) otherwise subscribed to the Confession when it was published.

While the school of thought known as Theonomy began to gain popularity in the late 20th century, it was sometimes summarily dismissed in Reformed circles as heresy by the "fact" that it contradicted the Westminster Standards:
To [Israel] also, as a body politic, he gave sundry judicial laws, which expired together with the state of that people; not obliging any other now, further than the general equity thereof may require.
(Westminster Confession, Chapter XIX, Section IV)
What "the general equity thereof may require," of course, is something that needs to be understood in light of the historical, grammatical context in which the statement was written.

If the authors of the Westminster Standards truly believed that the penal sanctions of the civil aspect of the Mosaic Law had no abiding validity, then understood in today's English it would seem this statement invariably settles the matter.

But did they actually believe that?
And if not, what is meant by that statement?

Read More
Comments

Voting NO for Your Local School Levy - A Biblical Case

11/4/2013

Comments

 
Picture
I realize the temptation to vote according to your wallet. Trust me, I feel it. And it could be there from either direction. You could be thinking “I don’t want to pay an extra $80 a month on my property taxes, so I’m voting this down.” Or you could be thinking (and I'm talking only wallet at this point), “I want my property to maintain its value at minimum and preferably go up. But in order to keep that value up I need to make sure our schools are well-funded; so I’m voting yes.”
But you need to keep in mind two things (among the others covered further down): (1) It’s not a matter of your wallet, but a matter of what is right in God’s eyes (Mt. 6:24), and (2) you’re not just voting for something that affects you; you’re voting for what affects your entire community. Who doesn’t want their property value to go up? Yet as a believer, are you willing to say it’s okay to go force your neighbor to apportion some of his own earnings toward keeping your property value up? Is that really loving your neighbor?

But I don't want to get ahead of myself.

First let me assure you of the things that I am not saying:


Read More
Comments

Book Review: No Other Standard

8/1/2013

Comments

 
Of all the wicked heresies and threatening movements facing the church in our day, when Westminster Seminary finally organized their faculty to write something in unison, they gave their determined political efforts: not to fight socialism, not to fight homosexuality, not abortion, not crime and mayhem in our society, not subjectivism in theology, not dispensationalism, not cultural relativism, not licentiousness, not defection from the New Testament, not defection from the Westminster Confession of Faith, all of which are out there, and they could give their legitimate efforts to. Boy the thing they had to write about - was Theonomy!

-Greg L. Bahnsen, "Law and Disgrace" sermon, Chalcedon Presbyterian Church, 1993
 
Picture
The Emperor Has No Clothes...still!

In 1973, Greg Bahnsen graduated from Westminster Theological Seminary (Philadelphia, PA) with two Master’s degrees (M. Div, Th.M.). His thesis, approved by the overseeing faculty, was “The Theonomic Responsibility of the Civil Magistrate,” in which he set out to establish the theological premise that unless otherwise indicated by further revelation from God Himself, God’s law, including the civil penal sanctions, has moral abiding validity. From the encouragement of his professor John Frame, he reworked this thesis so that it could be published as a book. In 1977 it was published as Theonomy in Christian Ethics. You can see my review for that work here.

In 1990 a book titled Theonomy: A Reformed Critique was published as a joint venture from the faculties at both Westminster Theological Seminaries (Philadelphia, PA and Escondido, CA) to establish a “Reformed answer” to Greg Bahnsen’s work (it took 17 years - from the date of his thesis - to formulate a “response”). In 1991, Bahnsen himself responded to their “critique” with this book, No Other Standard.

If you’ve ever wondered if there were any gaping holes in the Theonomic perspective of theology, this book will settle the matter. In his normal fashion, Bahnsen applies the doctrines of Scripture with rigorous logical skill to show that God’s Word must be our standard in all matters of life - including politics and socio-political ethics.


Read More
Comments

Book Review: By This Standard: The Authority of God's Law Today

1/17/2013

Comments

 
Picture
A terrific condensed book from his much larger workTheonomy in Christian Ethics. (If you're comparing page numbers it might be hard to see that since it goes from TiCE 563 pages to BTS 350 pages. But TiCE has 563 - 6"x9" pages - while BTS has 350 - 4"x6.75" pages. This makes a huge difference.)

By This Standard is in many ways better than Theonomy in Christian Ethics in that it doesn't read like a master's thesis, is more digestible in its chapter lengths, is aimed at a broader audience thus more accessible for the layman, and has a great succinct section at the end refuting criticisms of his previous work on the topic.

The main point of this book though is still the same: by what standard shall nations decide what is just in socio-political laws? By the standard God has revealed in Scripture.

For a review of that main point, see my review of Theonomy in Christian Ethics.

As for this book, Bahnsen applies the same principles of argumentation and clear exegesis but presents it in an easier tone. Of course this means his argument is not as exhaustive in this book; but it still carries the same weight. Chapter by chapter he uses Scripture over and over again to present the case. And just as before, while it is hard psychologically and emotionally sometimes to reach the conclusions he does. There doesn't seem to be any Biblical or logical reason not to come to the same conclusion.

I hope every Christian interested in the Christian life, the Christian's role in social responsibility, or the nature of law, justice, and/or crime and punishment will read this book - if nothing else to at least see a view presented from Scripture that is not advocated that much today but is very hard to combat (Acts. 26:14).


Read More
Comments

Book Review: A Biblical Case for Natural Law

1/14/2013

Comments

 
Picture
Not Even Close....

I'm not sure how Biblical this case was; and I'm not even sure it can be done, considering despite the attempt to show otherwise, if you're making a Biblical case for natural law, then you're not making a case simply for natural law but for natural law substantiated and validated by Biblical law.

I realize Dr. VanDrunen used parts of the Bible to demonstrate (or at least attempt to demonstrate) his view. But even a cursory reading leads one to see it's pretty clear there's a forcing of his view from outside of Scripture into the Scripture.

And while a cursory reading can find this pretty readily, it's always best to go into details when saying someone is not really presenting the Bible correctly. So here are a few examples:

[Loc. 83 (Kindle Version)]: "The term [Natural Law] generally refers to the moral order inscribed in the world and especially in human nature, an order that is known to all people through their natural faculties (especially reason and/or conscience) even apart from supernatural divine revelation and that binds morally the whole human race."

Here VanDrunen says there is a moral order known innately to all people, which morally binds them all. But how do we know what the specifics of those moral universals are? Well...eventually we have to discover them objectively in divine special revelation, as VanDrunen does later in his book [Loc 805]:

"In conclusion, the reader might note the range of evils that are prohibited by natural law as described merely in the texts discussed in this chapter [ed. note - consider this statement: natural-law-evils prohibited as described in the Biblical-texts - irony]: murder (Gen. 4), including infanticide (Ex. 1), rape (Genesis 34); violation of the marriage relationship (Genesis 12, 20, 26); harsh treatment of servants (Job 31); slave trading (Amos 1); and judicial corruption (Ex. 18). Even were natural law limited to these, such prohibitions would afford an impressive foundation for a civilized and orderly society."


Read More
Comments

Book Review: Theonomy in Christian Ethics

10/13/2012

Comments

 
Picture
A Masterpiece of Theology, Philosophy, and Biblical Scholarship

First let me say this: This book reads like a thesis (and as it started out as a thesis for a Master of Theology degree, that makes sense).

But what a Biblically substantiated, exegetically sound, and theologically insightful thesis it is - by a truly gifted theologian, teacher, and communicator!

It is so very rare that one comes across a book in which after finishing it he can say, "This book has truly altered the course of my life." If there is any one book - obviously apart from the Bible itself - of which this can be said by me, it is Greg Bahnsen's Theonomy in Christian Ethics.

The theonomic principle as stated by Bahnsen is simply this:

By "theonomy" I will mean that verbalized law of God which is imposed from outside man and revealed authoritatively in the words of Scripture" (p. 35).

Theonomy is God's Law - over against man's self-law - applied in all areas of life, both in the church and in society.

While throughout the history of the church it was taken on assumption that the Old Testament had abiding validity unless something in the New Testament was revealed to have cancelled or changed it in some way, in today's evangelical world just the opposite view seems to be the one most widely held: that unless a commandment is repeated in the New Testament, we should assume it no longer has abiding validity (a view with many more problems than one might think).

And so Bahnsen lays out cogently, articulately, and (most importantly) Biblically in 563 pages his thesis that the Old Testament Law is just as much applicable today as it was in the days before Christ, even in the area of the civil magistrate.

Read More
Comments

Book Review: Homosexuality: A Biblical View

6/11/2012

Comments

 
Picture
Originally published in 1978, I wondered if some of the arguments would be out-of-date. But really the arguments haven't changed that much from those who are in the homosexual community. "Oddly enough" God's word hasn't changed since 1978 either.

That being the case, this book is still a valuable resource and is helpful in providing a solid understanding to the discussion of homosexuality and the Christian church. Bahnsen's work on the topic is up to his normal standard: exegetically sound, well researched, and comprehensively woven together with airtight logic. He makes his case unapologetically using God's Word as the standard, and presses the reader to undertake the same task.

While homosexuality is a hot button today and the church is sometimes afraid of what to do about it, Bahnsen provides clear answers as well as cogent defenses to those who would try to persuade people otherwise. He makes clear distinctions in his vocabulary and is careful not to come across as legalistic or tyrannical; yet the reader comes away wondering how anyone could ever see the Bible endorsing or approving homosexuality, which is so often claimed today.


Read More
Comments

    For timely updates, Like us on Facebook:
    Lord over Life

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Apologetics
    Art
    Books
    Christian Ethics
    Culture
    Devotional
    Economics
    Education
    Entertainment
    Family
    Government
    History
    Homosexuality
    Law
    Marriage
    Movies
    Philosophy
    Politics
    Prayer Requests
    Reformed And Reforming
    Social Justice
    Society
    The Christian Life
    The Church
    Theology
    War

Follow LordoverLife
Lord over Life © 2014. All rights reserved.

 Home | About | Contact | Blog